The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ATSUSHI MARUYAMA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0478 Application No. 08/534,106 ____________ HEARD: Oct. 10, 2001 ____________ Before FLEMING, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The examiner rejected the appellant‘s claims 1, 3-5, and 7-12. He appeals therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal provides entertainment to passengers in an aircraft. Heretofore, a flight attendant sold “admission” to a film shown on an aircraft by renting headphones for connection to audio portsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007