Ex parte VUYLSTEKE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0490                                                        
          Application 08/335,917                                                      


          density values for visualization of the image.  The invention               
          is particularly directed to the manner in which the density of              
          low density areas in a diagnostically irrelevant zone in the                
          image are enhanced.                                                         
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               A method of processing an image in a radiographic imaging              
          system wherein an electric signal representation of said image              
          is mapped to density values for visualization as a hard or a                
          soft copy image characterized in that the density of low                    
          density area in a diagnostically irrelevant zone in the image               
          is enhanced and image structure in said zone is kept visible,               
          by converting in said diagnostically irrelevant zone of the                 
          image pixels located at position (x,y) according to a                       
          conversion function                                                         
          g(x,y) = a.f(x,y) + (1-a).f  wherein f(x,y) is the signal                   
                                     max                                              
          value before conversion of a pixel located at position (x,y),               
          a is a value between zero and one, and f  is equal to the                   
                                                  max                                 
          maximum of values f(x,y), prior to being subjected to mapping               
          into density values.                                                        
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Steele et al. (Steele)          4,803,639        Feb. 07, 1989              
          Vuylsteke et al. (Vuylsteke)    5,467,404        Nov. 14, 1995              
          (filed Aug. 03,                                                             
          1992)                                                                       
          Claims 1-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Vuylsteke in view               
          of Steele.                                                                  
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for                
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007