Appeal No. 1999-0497
Application 08/760,922
vehicle, said diagnostic interface connected to said receiver;
and
the receiver being switchable to the (re)initialization
readiness status only after reception of the external signal
fed to the receiver via the diagnostic interface from the
external diagnostic device;
wherein a new code signal is generated using the
transmitter and is transmitted to the receiver, the new code
signal then being stored as a new-predetermined code signal in
the receiver.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Lutz 4,366,466 Dec. 28, 1982
Sanders et al. (Sanders) 4,754,255 June 28, 1988
Keller 4,847,614 July 11, 1989
De Vaulx 4,888,575 Dec. 19, 1989
Sues et al. (Sues) 5,229,648 July 20, 1993
(filed Jan. 04,
1991)
Batey GB 2,144,249 Feb. 27, 1985
Claims 1, 4, 6-8, 12, 14 and 17 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Sanders and Lutz and either Sues or De Vaulx. Claims 2, 5,
10, 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Sanders and Lutz and either
Sues or De Vaulx and further in view of Batey. Claims 9, 15
and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over the teachings of Sanders and Lutz and either
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007