The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HIROKAZU SAITO
and
SUGIHIKO TADA
________________
Appeal No. 1999-0554
Application No. 08/657,903
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 6, 7
and 9. Claim 8, the other claim remaining in the present
application, has been allowed by the examiner (see page 1 of
Answer). Claim 6 is illustrative:
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007