Ex parte FURUHASHI et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 1999-0587                                                                                 
             Application 08/414,803                                                                               



                    Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                   
                    1.  An image generation apparatus wherein draw commands are transferred to a                  
             drawing device which generates an image in a frame buffer by drawing sequentially in                 
             accordance with said drawing commands, said drawing device comprising:                               
                    a read means for reading pixel data of an image which has been previously drawn               
             from said frame buffer;                                                                              
                    a mixing circuit for mixing the pixel data read from said frame buffer with pixel data        
             of a corresponding position where a next drawing operation is to be performed in a                   
             specified mixing ratio;                                                                              
                    a write means for writing mixed pixel data in the corresponding pixel position in             
             said frame buffer;                                                                                   
                    a mixing ratio memory for storing a plurality of said mixing ratio; and                       
                    a selection means for selecting the mixing ratio to be supplied to said mixing circuit        
             from said mixing ratio memory according to mixing ratio selection information in said draw           
             command.                                                                                             

                    The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                       
             Evangelisti et al. (Evangelisti)        4,823,281                  Apr. 18, 1989                     
             Kirk                                    5,335,318                  Aug.  2, 1994                     
                                                                         (filed June 10, 1992)                    
                    Claims 1, 9 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                      
             obviousness, the examiner relies upon Evangelisti in view of Kirk.                                   






                                                        2                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007