Ex parte OMAR et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1999-0597                                                        
          Application 08/592,812                                                      


          been withdrawn by the examiner [answer, page 2].                            
          The disclosed invention pertains to a three                                 
          dimensional display which is switchable between an                          
          autostereoscopic mode and a stereoscopic mode.                              
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   A three dimensional display, comprising:                          
                    an imaging system; and                                            
                    at least one illumination system arranged to                      
          illuminate a first limited region of space in which a three                 
          dimensional image is viewable in an autostereoscopic mode and               
          a second region of space which is extended with respect to the              
          first region and in which the three dimensional image is                    
          viewable in a stereoscopic mode,                                            
               wherein the three dimensional display is switchable                    
          between the autostereoscopic mode and the stereoscopic mode.                
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Travis                        5,132,839          July 21, 1992              
          Faris                         5,264,964          Nov. 23, 1993              
          Claims 1-4, 10, 11, 19, 20 and 22-26 stand rejected                         
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the                        
          disclosure of Faris.  Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35                
          U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Faris              
          in view of Travis.          Rather than repeat the arguments                
          of appellants or the examiner, we make reference to the briefs              

                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007