The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 47
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KENICHI SATO, NOBUHIRO SHIBUTA, HIDEHITO MUKAI, TAKESHI
HIKATA, MUNETSUGU UEYAMA and TAKESHI KATO
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0736
Application 08/167,581
___________
HEARD: July 10, 2001
___________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1, 3, 4, 6 to 8 and 10 to 12, all the claims remaining in
the application.
The claims on appeal are drawn to a method of preparing a
bismuth oxide superconducting wire, and are reproduced in
Appendix A of appellants’ brief.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007