The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HANNO REIMANN,
GÖTZ REIMANN,
and
SIEGFRIED MEININGER
__________
Appeal No. 1999-0772
Application No. 08/600,165
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 12 through 17 in the
above-identified application.1 Claims 7 through 11, which are
1 In response to the final Office action of December 16,
1997 (paper 12), the appellants submitted an amendment under 37
CFR § 1.116 (1981), proposing changes to claims 12 and 14-16.
The examiner indicated in the advisory action of March 23, 1998
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007