Ex parte STEVENS et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-0844                                                                                         
              Application 08/633,598                                                                                       




                     Representative claim 10 is reproduced below:                                                          
                     10.  An image sensor structure which provides low voltage electronic shuttering that                  
              is conducive to internal gettering comprising:                                                               
                     a substrate of n-type conductivity having a top and a bottom surface;                                 
                     a first laterally uniform, deep n-layer on top of the substrate and underneath the                    
              entire area of the image sensor and a second laterally uniform n-layer on top of the first                   
              laterally uniform n-layer; and                                                                               
                     a laterally uniform, lightly doped p-layer formed in the second laterally uniform n-                  
              layer, such that the p-layer is located beneath the image sensor and above the n-layer                       
              substrate and the first deep n-layer and;                                                                    
                     wherein the first laterally uniform, deep n-layer is more heavily doped than the                      
              second laterally uniform n-layer.                                                                            
                     The following reference is relied upon by the examiner:                                               

              Watanabe                            5,404,039                    Apr. 4, 1995                                

                     Claims 10, 11 and 13 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                               
              being anticipated by Watanabe.  As to a separate rejection relying on this reference,                        
              the examiner asserts unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 through 3, 5, 10, 11                  
              and 13 through 16, based upon Watanabe and appellants' admitted prior art Figure 4.                          
                     Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the examiner, reference is                     
              made to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                        



                                                            2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007