Appeal No. 1999-0888 Application No. 08/061,228 deficiency of the primary combination of AAPA and Ekusa with regard to claim 1. Consequently, we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 2 through 5 and 8. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) AG/RWK BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS L L P POST OFFICE BOX 1404 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6Last modified: November 3, 2007