Appeal No. 1999-0956
Application No. 08/584,084
of functioning in the manner called for in the preamble of claim
28. This being the case, the examiner has not met his initial
burden of establishing a prima facie case of anticipation.
In light of the foregoing, we shall not sustain the
rejection of claim 28, or claims 29-31 and 33-35 that depend
therefrom, as being anticipated by Labombarde.
17
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007