Ex Parte RICHTER et al - Page 3


               Appeal No. 1999-1008                                                                                                   
               Application 08/713,905                                                                                                 

               claims 1 and 2 and claims 3 and 4 “do not therefore stand or fall together.”  Thus, we decide this                     
               appeal based on appealed claims 1 and 3 as representative of the respective grounds of rejection.                      
               37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (1997).                                                                                           
                       We affirm both grounds of rejection.                                                                           
                       Rather than reiterate the respective positions advanced by the examiner and appellants,                        
               we refer to the examiner’s answer and to appellants’ brief for a complete exposition thereof.                          
                                                              Opinion                                                                 
                       Considering first the ground of rejection of appealed claim 1 under § 103(a), the examiner                     
               has taken the position that although Lehmann does not disclose the phosgenation of the specified                       
               ether polyamine to obtain the corresponding ether (poly)isocyanate in vapor phase, it would have                       
               been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in this art to conducted the phosgenation of the                     
               specific ether (poly)amines of Lehmann in the vapor phase from the combined teachings of this                          
               reference, Joulak, Biskup and Bischof, which latter three references teach the phosgenation of                         
               polyamines in the vapor phase (answer, page 5).                                                                        
                       We find that Lehman would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art that,                            
               contrary to the teachings of the prior art which would expect ether cleavage products to be                            
               formed during the phosgenation of ether (poly)amines to the corresponding isocyanate (col. 1,                          
               lines 15-28 and 56-62), the phosgenation of the specified ether (poly)amines by known methods                          
               will form desirable yields of the isocyanate with little if any cleavage (e.g., col. 1, lines 29-56 and                
               62-71, and col. 2, 16-33).  Lehmann teaches a number of processes, specifying only that the                            
               phosgenation process is conducted  “at a temperature up to about 200° C” (Lehman claim 4), and                         
               exemplifies carrying out the process in an inert solvent (Lehman Examples and Lehmann                                  
               claim 5).  While Lehmann does not specifically so state, one of ordinary skill in this art would                       
               have recognized from the reference that the processes of the reference are conducted under at                          
               least atmospheric pressure, not in a vacuum.  Joulak discloses that the phosgenation of aromatic                       
               (poly)amines to the corresponding isocyanates can be conducted with an excess of phosgene in                           
               the vapor phase with an inert, diluent carrier gas at a temperature which “advantageously ranges                       
               from 250° to 500° C” and under pressure (cols. 1-4).  The inert, diluent carrier gases used by                         
               Joulak (col. 2, lines 46-51) correspond to several of the solvents used by Lehmann.  Biskup                            


                                                                - 3 -                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007