Ex parte HUNG-CHE et al. - Page 2




                  Appeal No. 1999-1115                                                                                                                    
                  Application No. 08/821,217                                                                                                              


                  conventionally done, the instant invention improves upon the prior art by mounting the optical scanner                                  

                  and the driving motor integrally on a movable module to save space and cost.                                                            

                  Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                           

                           1.  An image head for scanning and sensing an image placed on a frame and a track in parallel                                  
                  to a direction of said scanning, comprising:                                                                                            
                           a movable module, having an optical reader and a driving motor integrally mounted to conserve                                  
                  space and capable of sliding back and forth along said track; and                                                                       
                           a coupling to a fixture on said frame capable of receiving a force exerted by said movable                                     
                  module and causing said movable [sic] to react and to slide along said track.                                                           


                  The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                                        

                           Carbone                                       4,525,748                            June 25, 1985                               
                           Hirano et al. (Hirano)                   5,235,353                           Aug. 10, 1993                                     
                           Nishio et al. (Nishio)                    5,669,048                            Sep. 16, 1997                                   


                  Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner cites                                          

                  Hirano and Carbone with regard to claims 1-5, 7 and 8, adding Nishio with regard to claims 6 and 9.                                     

                  Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the                                           

                  examiner.                                                                                                                               

                                                                      OPINION                                                                             



                           We affirm.                                                                                                                     



                                                                           -2-                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007