Ex parte SAWADA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1123                                                        
          Application No. 08/576,915                                                  


                    at least one digital/analog converter receiving                   
               said m bits of gradation data, having an output connected              
               to sources of said n output transistors, and producing a               
               voltage which is applied to the sources of said n output               
               transistors in accordance with the m bits of stored                    
               gradation data, wherein the driving current for the one                
               printing dot is controlled based on a combination of                   
               correction data and gradation data.                                    
                                                                                     
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Kapes, Jr. (Kapes)            4,074,320                     Feb.            
          14, 1978                                                                    
          Dahlquist et al. (Dahlquist) 5,062,002                 Oct. 29,             
          1991                                                                        
          Higuchi1                 1-160659                 June 23, 1989             
          (Published Japanese Kokai Patent Application)                               
               Claims 9 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                   
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Dahlquist in view of Higuchi              
          and Kapes.                                                                  
               Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 27 and 30)              
          and the answer (paper number 28) for the respective positions               
          of the appellants and the examiner.                                         
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered the entire record before us,              
          and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 9                   
          through 16.                                                                 

               1 A copy of the translation of this reference is attached.             
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007