Ex parte KIM et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                           
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                            
                                                                                      Paper No. 22                         

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                      __________                                                           
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Ex parte SI-WON KIM                                                       
                                                  and IN-SEONG BAIK                                                        
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                 Appeal No. 1999-1342                                                      
                                                 Application 08/568,232                                                    
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                HEARD: APRIL 24, 2001                                                      
                                                      __________                                                           
              Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                     Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims                   
              1 and 3 through 13, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                            
                     Representative claim 3 is reproduced below:                                                           
                     3.  An apparatus for use in conducting traffic-related business, comprising:                          
                     a driver's card for recording and reading out identification information about a driver               
              and traffic-related information;                                                                             


                                                            1                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007