The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte SI-WON KIM and IN-SEONG BAIK __________ Appeal No. 1999-1342 Application 08/568,232 __________ HEARD: APRIL 24, 2001 __________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 13, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. Representative claim 3 is reproduced below: 3. An apparatus for use in conducting traffic-related business, comprising: a driver's card for recording and reading out identification information about a driver and traffic-related information; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007