Ex parte FRUTIGER - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1999-1451                                                                              
            Application No. 08/481,593                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     

            The appellant's invention relates to an electrostatic wafer clamp.  An understanding of           
            the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced             
            below.                                                                                            
            1.     Apparatus for electrostatic clamping of a workpiece, comprising:                           
                   a platen including at least three platen sections, said at least three platen sections     
            comprising a conductive material and being electrically isolated from each other;                 
                   a dielectric material disposed on said at least three platen sections, said dielectric     
            materials having a clamping surface for receiving a workpiece; and                                
                   means for applying a polyphase clamping voltage to said platen, said at least three        
            platen sections being connected to different phases of said polyphase clamping voltage            
            so that the workpiece is electrostatically clamped in a fixed position on said clamping           
            surface by electrostatic force between the workpiece and said platen sections, said               
            electrostatic clamping apparatus being operable to clamp the workpiece to said clamping           
            surface in vacuum.                                                                                
            The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed          
            claims are:                                                                                       
            Klass et al. (Klass)             3,197,682                       Jul. 27, 1965                    
            Briglia                          4,184,188                 Jan. 15, 1980                          
            Lewin                            4,554,611                 Nov. 19, 1985                          

            Claims 1, 2, 7-14, 19-22, and 61-66 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
            unpatentable over Klass.  Claims 3 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           




                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007