Ex parte HENZEN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-1559                                                        
          Application No. 08/762,687                                                  


          selection circuit 20 which varies the frequency based upon the              
          measured temperature.                                                       
               The independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                      
          1.   A liquid crystal display device comprising a first sub                 
               strate which is provided with electrodes, and a                        
               second substrate which is parallel to the first                        
               substrate and is provided with electrodes, and a                       
               twisted nematic liquid crystal material having a                       
               positive dielectric anisotropy between the two                         
               substrates, while, viewed perpendicularly to the                       
               substrates, overlapping parts of the electrodes                        
               define pixels, the display device being further                        
               provided with drive means for presenting voltages to                   
               the electrodes, characterized in that the drive                        
               means are provided with means for controlling the                      
               frequency at which pixels are driven, dependent on                     
               the temperature of the display device.                                 
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Fukai et al. (Fukai)          4,045,791                Aug. 30,             
          1977                                                                        
          Tsuboyama et al. (Tsuboyama)  4,902,107                Feb. 20,             
          1990                                                                        


               Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Tsuboyama in view of Appellant's                 
          admitted prior art.                                                         
               Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as being unpatentable over Fukai in view of Appellant's                     
          admitted prior art.                                                         
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007