Ex parte JARAMILLO et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                                                            Paper No. 12              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte PAUL D. JARAMILLO                               
                                        and                                           
                                     FRANK H. WU                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-1581                                  
                             Application No. 08/651,369                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 3, 5 through 11 and 13 through 16.  In an Amendment                 
          After Final (paper number 5), claims 1, 2, 9 and 10 were                    
          amended.                                                                    
               The disclosed invention relates to word classification in              
          a speech recognition system that allows multiple speech                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007