Ex Parte LYNN - Page 2




         Appeal No. 1999-1590                                                        
         Application No. 08/803,624                                                  


               1.   A device for monitoring the menstrual cycle of a woman,          
         said device comprising:                                                     
               a housing;                                                            
               memory means for storing associated dates of the woman's              
         menstrual cycle;                                                            
               a display disposed on said housing;                                   
               display drive means responsive to said memory means for               
         displaying said associated dates of the woman's menstrual cycle             
         on said display;                                                            
               means for automatically updating said associated dates of             
         the woman's menstrual cycle on the basis of menstrual data stored           
         in said memory means and the current date; and                              
               means for adjusting said menstrual data so as to reflect the          
         woman's particular menstrual cycle.                                         
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                  
         examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
         Desjacques                4,367,527                Jan. 04, 1983            
               Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
         being unpatentable over Desjacques.                                         
               Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under the judicially               
         created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being              
         unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,606,535.                  
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 14,             
         mailed January 28, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning in           
         support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper Nos.             
         13 and 15, filed December 21, 1998 and January 15, 1999,                    
         respectively) for appellant's arguments thereagainst.                       

                                         2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007