Ex parte JENNER et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 1999-1638                                                                                   
             Application No. 08/721,395                                                                             

                                                 BACKGROUND                                                         
                    The invention is directed to an electrical connector having conductors arranged to              
             achieve reduction in crosstalk.   Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                          
             1.     An electrical connector comprising:                                                             
                    a dielectric housing; and                                                                       
                    a plurality of conductors situated within the housing having a generally flat blade             
             portion disposed at an output end of the housing, an intermediate portion and an insulation            
             displacement contact (IDC) portion for receiving an individual wire, wherein the                       
             intermediate portions of adjacent conductors are alternately situated substantially in a               
             lower or an upper plane and are alternately of a shorter or a longer length.                           
                    The examiner relies on the following references:                                                
             Davis et al.  (Davis)                    5,123,859                  Jun. 23, 1992                      
             Baker, III et al.  (Baker)               5,226,835                  Jul. 13, 1993                      

                    Claims 1-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                     
             Baker and Davis.                                                                                       
                    We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 6) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                  
             No. 11) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 9) for                  
             appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand rejected.                                  


                                                     OPINION                                                        
                    The Baker reference, which we note is discussed on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’                 
             specification, discloses an arrangement of conductors in an electrical connector for                   

                                                        -2-                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007