Appeal No. 1999-1713 Application No. 08/716,037 that such prerequisite steps do not meet the claimed requirement of forcing the paste through the stencil openings. Billow, cited by the examiner in the rejection of dependent claims 21-24, does not meet the basic deficiency of Schoenthaler discussed above. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) TERRY J. OWENS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007