Appeal No. 1999-1789
Application No. 08/920,652
Accordingly, since we are of the opinion that the
prior art applied by the Examiner does not support the
obviousness rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of
independent claims 15, 20, and 21, nor of claims 16-19
dependent thereon. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision
rejecting claims 15-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007