Appeal No. 1999-1803 Application No. 08/968,845 complete seal was never intended by Wisner. It seems more likely that the shield in Wisner is merely used to prevent leaking refrigerant from directly spraying someone located near the compressor. Since we agree with appellants on the narrow question of fact argued before us, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of any of the appealed claims. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-18 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007