Ex parte MURPHY - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not  
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.  
                                                            Paper No. 19          
                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                  ____________                                    
                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                  ____________                                    

                         Ex parte NICHOLAS J. N. MURPHY                           
                                  ____________                                    
                              Appeal No. 1999-1845                                
                           Application No. 08/659,132                             
                                  ____________                                    
                              HEARD: June 14, 2001                                
                                  ____________                                    

         Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.    
         JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                


                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134              
         from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21, which constitute           
         all the claims in the application.                                       
         The disclosed invention pertains to a graphics                           
         processing system in which the same address locations of a               
         buffer memory are used to store both color values and depth              
         values.                                                                  
         Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007