Ex parte RICHARDS - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1999-1847                                                                                            
              Application No. 08/810,581                                                                                      


                                                      BACKGROUND                                                              

              The appellant's invention relates to a remote ink fountain selection method and                                 
              apparatus.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary                        
              claim 7, which is reproduced below.                                                                             
                      7.     A method for aiding remote ink fountain selection comprising the                                 
                      steps of:                                                                                               
                             digitizing sample images and providing each said sample image with                               
                      an identification;                                                                                      
                             digitizing a printed signature image from a printing press which                                 
                      corresponds to at least one of the sample images;                                                       
                             comparing the digitized printed signature image to the digitized                                 
                      sample images; and                                                                                      
                             outputting the identification of the digitized sample image upon a                               
                      match with the digitized signature image.                                                               
                      The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                          
              appealed claims is:                                                                                             
              Wuhrl et al. (Wuhrl)                 5,163,012                     Nov. 10, 1992                                

              Claims 7-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph as failing to provide                         
              an enabling disclosure.  Claims 7-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being                              
              anticipated or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Wuhrl.                              




                                                              2                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007