Ex parte NALDI - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                               Paper No. 21           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                Ex parte VALTER NALDI                                 
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-1912                                  
                             Application No. 08/730,724                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                HEARD:  April 26, 2001                                
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, COHEN, and STAAB, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s                    
          refusal to allow claims 1-18 as amended by an amendment filed               
          subsequent to the final rejection.  At an oral hearing on                   
          April 26, 2001, Israel Gopstein, attorney for appellant,                    
          withdrew the appeal as to claims 1, 2, 5 and 7-14.                          
          Accordingly, the appeal as to claims 1, 2, 5 and 7-14 is                    
          dismissed, leaving claims 3, 4, 6, and 15-18 for our review.                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007