Appeal No. 1999-1995
Application No. 08/772,840
laterally and forward and back in relation to said operator
wherein
at least one roller is mounted on an axle,
said axle is mounted on at least one bracket in proximity
to said work station,
said roller is enabled to rotate and slide upon said
axle,
said appendage is engaged to bear generally on an upper
cylindrical surface of said roller, during any movement.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Culver 4,712,101 Dec. 08,
1987
Avila 4,799,049 Jan. 17,
1989
Claim 72 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Culver.
Claims 73 and 75 through 77 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Culver in view of Avila.
Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 11,
mailed February 8, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning
in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007