Appeal No. 1999-2022 Application No. 08/963,987 page 5 of the final rejection. However, since Miyagawa does not cure the deficiency noted above regarding claim 1, and claims 5 to 8 depend on claim 1, we, for the same rationale, do not sustain the rejection of claims 5-8 over Tan, Lee and Miyagawa. In conclusion, we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-3, 12 and 14-18, over Tan and Lee, and claims 5-8 over Tan, Lee and Miyagawa. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007