Ex parte BOUCHERON et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                         
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                          
                                                                                     Paper No. 24                        

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                     __________                                                          
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     __________                                                          
                                        Ex parte JEAN-LOUIS BOUCHERON                                                    
                                                and DANIEL SEGAUD                                                        
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 1999-2067                                                     
                                                Application 08/911,064                                                   
                                                     __________                                                          
                                               HEARD: APRIL 10, 2001                                                     
                                                     __________                                                          
              Before THOMAS, LALL and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       
                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

                     Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims                 
              5, 7, 8 and 27, claims 2 through 4 and 9 through 25 having been made subject to a                          
              restriction requirement.                                                                                   
                     Independent claim 27 is reproduced below:                                                           
                     27.  An electrical lamp module for a block of signaling lights for a motor vehicle,                 
              said module comprising;                                                                                    


                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007