Appeal No. 1999-2107 Page 14 Application No. 08/926,299 We will not, however, sustain this rejection of dependent claim 38, which locates the pad means in the shoe sole, as opposed to the shoe upper, as is specified in patent claim 6. SUMMARY The rejection of claims 27 and 30-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is not sustained. The rejection of claims 34, 37, 38, 43 and 48 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is not sustained. The rejection of claims 27, 30-38, 43 and 48 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Vermonet in view of Vaccari is not sustained. The rejection of claims 27, 30-33, 35, 36, 38, 43 and 48 under 35 U.S.C. § 135(b) is not sustained. The rejection of claims 34 and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 135(b) is sustained. The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007