Appeal No. 1999-2207 Application No. 08/967,152 relying upon speculation with respect to the teachings of Allina. Therefore, we find that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness and we will not sustain the rejection of independent claim 13. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 7-14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) jld/vsh 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007