Appeal No. 1999-2230 Application 08/465,236 22. Microcapsules, suitable for intra-arterial administration, being hollow and enclosing a gas- or vapor-filled space essentially without solid material therein and being capable of being dried to form a powder of such microcapsules, in which more than 30% of the microcapsules have a diameter within a 2 :m range and at least 90% have a diameter within the ranges 12.0-25.0 :m. [Emphasis added.] 23. Microcapsules, suitable for intra-arterial administration, being hollow and enclosing a gas- or vapor-filled space essentially without solid material therein and being capable of being dried to form a powder of such mircocapsules, in which the interquartile range of diameters is 2 :m or less and the median diameter is between 12.0 :m and 25.0 :m inclusive. [Emphasis added.] 24. A pharmaceutical composition suitable for intra-arterial administration, comprising hollow microcapsules of which at least 90% have a diameter of 12.0-25.0 :m, and at least 30% have a diameter within a 2 :m range essentially without solid material therein and being capable of being dried to form a powder of such microcapsules. [Emphasis added.] 28. A process comprising the step of atomizing a solution or dispersion of a wall- forming material in a liquid carrier into a gas in order to obtain hollow microcapsules by evaporation of the liquid carrier, wherein said microcapsules are suitable for intra-arterial administration, at least 90% of the microcapsules are 12.0-25.0 :m in diameter, and at least 30% have a diameter within a 2 :m range. [Emphasis added.] The References In rejecting the appealed claims on prior art grounds, the examiner relies on the following references: Sands 4,420,442 Dec. 13, 1983 Erbel et al. (Erbel) 5,137,928 Aug. 11, 1992 Mathiowitz et al. (Mathiowitz) 5,271,961 Dec. 21, 1993 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007