Appeal No. 1999-2259 Application 08/711,614 an extruded form being cutable to a length determined by the particular width of any one of the busway housings on which it is to be used, said extruded form having at least one generally flat surface extending along a longitudinal axis of said surge clamp for continuously engaging a generally flat surface of said any one of the busway housings and defining a centrally located passage extending longitudinally from a first end of said surge clamp to a second end of said surge clamp. In rejecting Appellant’s claims, the Examiner relies on two references: Slicer et al. (Slicer) 4,705,334 Nov. 10, 1987 Rinderer 5,580,014 Dec. 3, 1996 Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Rinderer. Claims 2, 3, 6-8 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over the combination of Rinderer and Slicer. Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant and Examiner, we refer the reader to 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007