Appeal No. 1999-2263
Application 08/581,721
In summary, since we do not find the examiner’s
proposed modifications to be suggested by the applied prior
art, we do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 5
and 6. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1, 5 and 6 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007