Ex parte MONS - Page 1




                                       THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                            
              The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
              not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                              
                                                                                                     Paper No. 28              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                  __________________                                                           
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                  __________________                                                           
                                              Ex parte JOHANNES J. MONS                                                        
                                                  __________________                                                           
                                                  Appeal No. 1999-2269                                                         
                                                  Application 08/558,517                                                       
                                                    ________________                                                           
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                    ________________                                                           
              Before HAIRSTON, SMITH, JERRY and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           
                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            

                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 3 through 7.                                        
                      The disclosed invention relates to control information on a disc-like record carrier                     
              that is indicative of the diameter of the record carrier.                                                        
                      Claims 3, 6 and 7 are illustrative of the claimed invention, and they read as follows:                   
                      3.     An information recording and/or reading apparatus comprising drive means                          
              for rotatingly driving a disc-like record carrier having a predefined diameter, control                          
              information comprising diameter information including an encoding of the predefined                              
              diameter of the disc-like record carrier being accommodated on the record carrier,                               
              components whose behavior depends on the diameter of the record carrier, and means for                           
              reading the diameter information and for setting the components in dependence on the                             
              diameter information and for adapting the diameter-dependent behavior of said                                    
              components.                                                                                                      







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007