Ex parte BLAESER et al. - Page 13

          Appeal No. 1999-2285                                                        
          Application 08/826,277                                                      


          For the reasons discussed above, we do not sustain the                      
          examiner’s rejection of the claims on appeal.  Therefore, the               
          decision of the examiner rejecting claims 25-34 is reversed.                


          REVERSED                                                                    







                                                       )                              
                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         PARSHOTAM S. LALL             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                         JOSEPH L. DIXON               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              









                                          13                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007