Appeal No. 1999-2290 Page 11
Application No. 08/763,955
art" to reject the claims on appeal. The examiner's
unsupported assertions are not a substitute for evidence, and
do not amount to the substantial evidence required to
establish a prima facie
showing of obviousness of the claimed invention. Accordingly,
the examiner's rejection of claims 7-14 and 16-18 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 7-14 and 16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007