Ex parte BURKS et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 14              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                      Ex parte JAMES L. BURKS, ROBERT R. SCHICK                       
                              and SHEILA H. SCHWEITZER                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2311                                  
                               Application 08/777,805                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                HEARD: June 14, 2001                                  
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and BARRY, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-14, 16-23, 28,              
          29, 32-37, 39-43, 46 and 51-54, which constitute all the                    
          claims remaining in the application.                                        
          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for communicating medical transactions between a                  

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007