The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JAMES L. BURKS, ROBERT R. SCHICK and SHEILA H. SCHWEITZER __________ Appeal No. 1999-2311 Application 08/777,805 ___________ HEARD: June 14, 2001 ___________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-14, 16-23, 28, 29, 32-37, 39-43, 46 and 51-54, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for communicating medical transactions between a 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007