Ex parte FARRIS et al. - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1999-2317                                       Page 9           
          Application No. 08/634,543                                                  


          each of said pair of switching systems; ... said Internet                   
          modules being linked to signal transfer points in said control              
          network ....”  Similarly, claim 17 specifies in pertinent part              
          the following limitations: "at least a pair of said central                 
          office switching systems having connected thereto an Internet               
          module, said central office switching systems providing                     
          selective connection between said modules and the subscriber                
          lines connected to each of said pair of central office                      
          switching systems; ... said Internet modules being linked to                
          signal transfer points in said control network ....”                        
          Accordingly, claims 10-22 require inter alia linking                        
          origination and destination COs’ respective Internet modules                
          to signal transfer points (“STPs”) in a CCIS.                               


               The examiner fails to show a teaching or suggestion of                 
          the limitations in the applied prior art.  Gordon’s UniPost                 
          system omits STPs.  Although Wheeler’s AIN includes STPs 23,                
          25, and 31, (fig. 1A,) it is unclear why one of ordinary skill              
          in the art would have linked Gordon’s UniPost Access Nodes                  
          thereto.                                                                    









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007