Appeal No. 1999-2348
Application No. 08/586,716
cure the deficiency noted above in regard to claims 1 and 13,
we cannot sustain the obviousness rejection of these claims
over Tayloe, Ono and Zoffinger.
In summary, we have not sustained the rejections of claims
1, 2, 8, 10 to 13 and 19 to 24 over Tayloe and Ono, and claims
3 to 7, 9 and 14 to 18 over Tayloe, Ono, and Zoffinger.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 to 24
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007