Ex parte GOULET et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
            Ex parte ROGER JOSEPH GOULET, PETER MICHAEL RAMSDEN, JERAULD              
          LEE DICKERSON and SUSAN RAMILO WILLIAMS                                     
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1999-2423                                  
                               Application 08/825,204                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before GARRIS, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 15-17.  Claims 18-21, which are all of the other claims              
          remaining in the application, stand objected to as being                    
          dependent from a rejected claim but allowable if rewritten in               
          independent form.                                                           


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007