Appeal No. 1999-2544 Page 22
Application No. 08/796,513
indefinite for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as
the invention;
reversed the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1
and 12 under 35 U.S.C § 102(b) as being anticipated by
Jackson;
reversed the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1,
2, 4, 6, 8 through 15 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Jackson in view of Zwann or Lambert;
reversed the decision of the examiner to reject claims 3
and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Jackson in view of Zwann or Lambert, and further in view of
either Sumiyoshi or Garcera; and
reversed the decision of the examiner to reject claims 5,
7, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Jackson in view of Zwann or Lambert, and further in view
of Ebneth.
Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007