Appeal No. 1999-2566
Application 08/868,935
cut portion of said form web and said transfer patch exclusive
of said backer ply;
whereby said use segment remains integral with the
remainder of said form web, and when said delineated use
segment is removed therefrom, said delineated segments of said
laminate and said adhesive coating of said transfer patch are
removed with said portion of said form web within said die
cut, and said backer ply remains secured to said reverse side
of said form web.
THE REFERENCES
Holmes et al. (Holmes) 4,902,375 Feb. 20,
1990
Steidinger et al. (Steidinger) 5,441,796 Aug. 15,
1995
Stewart 5,482,328 Jan. 9,
1996
THE REJECTIONS
The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
follows: claims 1-3, 12-20, 23 and 25 over Steidinger in view
of Holmes;1 claims 24 and 26 over Steidinger in view of Holmes
and Stewart; and claims 1-3, 12-20 and 23-26 over Stewart in
view of Holmes.
1 The examiner states (answer, page 3) that claim 23 was
inadvertently omitted from the statement of this rejection.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007