Ex parte FERLA et al. - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication        
                                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                                                                             Paper No. 16                     
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               _____________                                                  
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                               _____________                                                  
                           Ex parte GIUSEPPE FERLA and FERRUCCIO FRISINA                                      
                                               _____________                                                  
                                            Appeal No. 1999-2578                                              
                                          Application No. 08/811,363                                          
                                              ______________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                             _______________                                                  
            Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LALL,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 19-34.                     
                   The invention is directed to a high density power device.  More particularly, a            
            process is disclosed which is said to allow higher scales of integration in power                 
            MOSFETS.  The process for manufacturing such power MOSFETS includes an                            
            implantation mask for the source regions which coincides with the implantation mask               




                                                      1                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007