Appeal No. 1999-2594 Application No. 08/777,720 when said stop key is input by the user from said operational panel during said dialing of the corresponding telephone number registered for said abbreviated dial number, successively counting each time the user input of said stop key from said operational panel, and automatically printing a list of registered abbreviated dial numbers with corresponding telephone numbers registered in said facsimile system for user dialing information, when a count value of the user input of said stop key reaches said predetermined value. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Fukushima et al. (Fukushima) 5,293,256 Mar. 08, 1994 Claims 1-4 and 8-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Fukushima. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 16, mailed Oct. 27, 1998) for the examiner's reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 15, filed Aug. 18, 1998) and reply brief (Paper No. 18, filed Dec. 28, 1998) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to appellant's specification and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007