The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES E. JERVIS
__________
Appeal No. 1999-2649
Application 08/483,291
___________
HEARD: February 7, 2001
___________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21,
23, 25 to 31, 34 to 38, 40 to 42 and 44 to 46. Claims 32, 33,
39 and 43 were also finally rejected, but the examiner states
on page 2 of the answer that claims 32 and 33 are allowed, and
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007