The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MICHAEL J. BERRY ____________ Appeal No. 1999-2674 Application No. 08/192,979 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 59 through 75. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellant’s invention pertains to a method of reshaping an outside surface of a cornea of an eye. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 59 and 73, copies of which appear in “APPENDIX 1" to the main brief (Paper No. 21).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007