Ex parte SATO - Page 13




          Appeal No. 1999-2703                                                        
          Application No. 08/772,068                                                  


               We have sustained the rejection of claims 1 and 3 under                
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) but not the rejection of claims 5 and 7                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e).  We have sustained the rejection of               
          claims 2 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 but not the rejection of               
          claims 6 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                       


               The examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.                           


               No period for taking any subsequent action in connection               
          with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                   


                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    





                         ERROL A. KRASS                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                                                       )    APPEALS                   
                                                       )      AND                     
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                         MICHEAL R. FLEMING            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                                                     


                                         13                                           





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007