Appeal No. 1999-2705
Application 08/686,756
reasoning is essentially the same. For the reasons stated in
the analysis of claim 1, we conclude that the Examiner has
failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness as to
claim 13. The rejection of claims 13 and its dependent claims
14-16 is reversed.
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007