Appeal No. 1999-2760 Application 08/773,304 simply listed by Harmer at col. 8, lines 52 and 53, as one of the ethylenically unsaturated monomers usable in the make coat precursor; we do not find any disclosure in Harmer which would have suggested to one of ordinary skill that “it is known to use acryloxy for better curing,” as the examiner states, and certainly no teaching or suggestion that a urea-aldehyde/EVA system as disclosed by Engen would have better curing or be improved in any other way if an acryloxy group-containing compound were added thereto. As for Harmer’s disclosure of a photosensitizer, the reference states that photosensitizers may be included “in the polymerizable compositions” (col. 16, lines 49 to 51), i.e., in the polymerizable compositions disclosed by Harmer. However, since the polymerizable compositions disclosed by Harmer are not of the same type as the urea-aldehyde/EVA binder precursor composition disclosed by Engen, we do not consider that Harmer would have taught one of ordinary skill to include a photosensitizer in the Engen precursor. In other words, given the differences between the polymer systems disclosed in the two references, there would have been no 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007